12
Ago
2013
0

Troppe cazzo di regole! – Too many fucking rules!

Troppe cazzo di regole!

Davvero troppe. La maggior parte delle quali inutili o prive di senso.

Un’avversione sempre più evidente per la fotografia. Divieti su divieti, senza una logica né un minimo di spiegazione.

Per chi, come me, è sempre stato insofferente alle imposizioni irrazionali, è una sofferenza fin troppo eccessiva.

Per quattro scatti “rubati” col telefonino al Museo Picasso di Malaga, per poco non finisco sotto il giogo della Santa Inquisizione Spagnola.
E intendiamoci, non che stessi fotografando i quadri dell’Artista eh!

Urla e minacce che mi hanno costretto ad una colorita discussione con alcuni addetti alla sicurezza che giocavano agli 007, neanche avessero a che fare con un redivivo Osama Bin Laden.

Per farli smettere ho dovuto alzare il tono di voce di diverse ottave.
E pensare che tutto ciò si sarebbe potuto evitare con un cartello ben in evidenza all’ingresso ed un pizzico di buona educazione.

ENGLISH

Too many fucking rules!

Really too many. Most of them useless or meaningless.

An increasing aversion for photography. Prohibitions on prohibitions, without logic or a minimum of explanation.

For those, like me, that has always been intolerant of stupid rules, is really unbearable.

For few shots stolen with my cell phone at the Picasso Museum in Malaga, I was almost “arrested by the Spanish Inquisition”.
And without taking pictures of the Artist paintings!

Some security officers – playing the secret agents – shouted and threatened me like if I was the new Osama Bin Laden.

To get them stop I had to shout over them.
All this could have been avoided with a sign placed at the entrance and a bit of good education.

15 Responses

  1. Miki

    Oggi come velocità di commento sono addirittura fuori dal podio 🙂
    Le regole, soprattutto quelle artistiche, nascono per essere superate o infrante. Chapeau!

  2. mm

    Ciao Sara, scusa il ritardo!
    La curiosità è una virtù fondamentale per ampliare i propri orizzonti.
    Shampoo è un diminutivo che io ed il Doc usiamo per lo Champagne.
    Contenta?
    🙂

  3. در 10:01 pmsaghi میگوید:salam man ghabaln namzad dashtam rabete anchenan ham baham nadashtimnamzadimunoam 4 mah bud va beham khordalan ye kahstegar daram nemidunam in mozu ro bahash dar miyun bezaram yanamitarsam age begam ishun pashimun shan

  4. در 12:33 pmMB683 میگوید:shoma bayad bishtar az ghabl besh aamhiyat bedid sai konid az lahaze atefi tahrikesh konid har rooz barash taze bashid va bomb baran atefish konid zemnan faramosh nashe ziad az had ham nabashe chon shirini ziad delo mizaneh..!omidvaram movafagh bashid

  5. //For e.g if the Brahmins get 5 percent, so to say, quota, the quota will be taken by the mithgy among them. The economically weakest like priests cant compete with their rich counterparts.It should be left to the caste leaders of brahmins to build safeguards for the weak – the priests, the women, the phycially handicapped etc. within the caste, within the 5 per cent quota.Ditto for dalits etc.//ஜ .அ.மலன ர யன பன ன ன ட ,Honest answer needed.Rather than eradicating caste differences, your idea is to perpetuate the caste identity and caste identity based differences. Yes or no ?A SC will always be a SC for the next 2000 years. An OBC will be OBC for another 2000 years and feed shit to SC people.Excellent Social Justice. Keep it up followers of EVR and his butt lickers.//When the whole population gets covered under quota, there wont be any question of merits.//Yes, because there will be none.இந த ய வ ன த ச யப பறவ ய மய ல க க ப பத ல க க க ய க ஆக க வ டல ம . மன தர க க மட ட ம ஏன வக ப ப வ ர ப ப ரத ந த த த வம ? ம ர கங கள க க ம வழங க வ ம .ம ழ ய ல ம , ப ர ம ப ன ம இந த ப ச வத ல த ச ய ம ழ இந த மட ட ம என ற அற வ த த வ டல ம . தம ழ , ஆங க லம ப ச ன ல டவ சர க கழட ட ப ஞ ச ம ல ஏற ந க கச ச ல ல வ ம , ப ர ல ம ண ட ல !சம க ந த வ ழ க! வக ப ப வ ர ப ப ரத ந த த த வம வ ழ க! வ ழ கவ !

  6. نظر خود را بنویسید شما می‌تونید از این برچسب‌ها استفاده کنید HTML برچسب‌ها: <a> <abbr> <acronym> <b> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del> <em> <i> <q> <strike> <strong>

  7. . Your clarification was surely the easiest to comprehend. I tell you, I mostly grow irritated several time folks discuss issues that these people evidently don’t understand about. You were able to strike the nail on the head along with spelled out the whole thing with out confusion. Perhaps, folks might take a signal. Will likely be back to obtain more. Appreciate it.

Leave a Reply

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.